TO FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE: CHARLES WALKER DESERVES A SINCERE REPLY TO HIS QUESTIONS
By Ifeanyi Chijioke
For Family Writers
I have always maintained that irrespective of political or party affiliations, human right or human existence should be jealously protected by all. Diplomacy should not be taken to a faulty extent and only truth can give a shot at a better world. In this my essay, I plan to establish truth that Charles Walker may know the truth even though he may not build on it. It is my moral responsibility as a pro-Biafra journalist under Family Writers to sincerely bring Charles Walker to the tent of truth relating to his three powerful questions directed to Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
Charles Walker to have waded in and demanded clarifications is only but a humanitarian concern. Despite the fact I don’t know him, he is worthy of honor and I can rightly crown him ambassador of human right campaigners. There are others touched, who have reacted to the conscience of man that abhors evil and persecution. Biafra is a call for justice and sustenance of human existence in this part of the world where a race is a species of terror. We are a breed of terror and have left our land to foreign lands in search of peaceful existence and freedom, where at least we can have a merited sense of belonging. Charles, take a count and you will be shocked that Biafrans are the most traveled people on earth. We travel because our land is under slavery through perpetual political, infrastructural, economical and military conquest.
Charles Walker, my decision to giving a gospel reply to questions is to prove that we have moved on from 1967 and this is a computer age where nothing is hidden except nobody wants to know. The office of the Foreign and Commonwealth gave a reply which I will not oppose. They are entitled to how they want things to appear but they are not entitled to stopping the truth Charles deserves. I will digress; Foreign and Commonwealth office was quick to reiterate the unchanged position to protect the territorial integrity of Nigeria, though as a parent to the said territory, I expect nothing less than parental protection. Take a step backward and you will see the reaction of this office to Charles was what caused the most gruesome genocide on African soil without any punishment for the perpetrators. In 1967 to 1969, UK played a biased role and shielded Nigerian state while she kill and maim human life. You blocked all efforts for truth to be established and even the delegates sent to know what was going on in Biafra which you sponsored against peace-keeping soldiers. You restricted them from reporting what was going on, you were only interested in the economical gain of your monster and never gave any value to our existence. While some MPs fought to save Biafra from extermination, you worked hand in hand to cover everything just as you are covering it against Charles Walker. We did not finish, we defended our lives and today we are here but this second civil war, blood will flow to your domain.
APEX HYPOCRISY! British Foreign and Commonwealth Office denies knowledge of Nigeria brutality against Biafrans
You continued with lies while millions were perishing, you continued with effort to protect your monstrous creation at the detriment of Biafran lives and neither has you worked to tame your monster. You have kept the reality away from Charles because you think this is 1967 when no one had access to internet and computer. I am in Biafra land and hence I will give Charles the first hand information of what is going on as regards to his questions. You lied that there was no genocide going on in 1967 until pictures began to emerge, you are again lying that there is no potential civil war, Islamization through grazing bill, persecution and unwarranted clampdown on Biafrans. You are lying that there is no institutionalized degradation, when the leader of Indigenous People of Biafra (a product of 2007 UN declaration) has been in detention since October for being a British citizen and for verbally demanding freedom.
Charles, there is a potential risk of massive civil war in Nigeria as a result of the policy of Nigeria on Biafra. The policies as follows; (a) That for mentioning Biafra and peacefully adhering to 2007 charter on the rights of indigenous people, we have committed a crime called treasonable felony. (b) That our leader Nnamdi Kanu will not be released against court ruling and shall be incarcerated, convicted or killed. (c) That for lawfully and peacefully asking for Biafra, we shall be killed, incarcerated and forced to disappear. (d) That genocide shall be committed against us any day we come out to ask for Kanu’s release or Biafra, as it happened in Aba, Onitsha, Portharcourt, Delta etc. (e) that we shall not be included in the federation because we did not vote a sitting President. (f) That our land shall be a conquered land exploited at our detriment.
These policies prompted a movement most likely to result to civil war, the militant across Biafra land has mandated the release of Nnamdi Kanu and disintegration of Nigeria which as I speak, there is a war now on oil-field (war front) which is our battlefield and escalation is only a matter of time. While we are being killed and the Nigerian state cannot protect us because we are Biafrans, we may likely press self-defense button to save our lives.
Charles, there is no confiscation of any land in Biafra yet, but there is a law being sponsored by Buhari, which will give him right to confiscate Biafran lands and host his murderous Hausa/Fulani herdsmen jihadists and terrorists that have ravaged our land. Since 1989 Abuja declaration that Biafra land shall be Islamized to ensure full circle of Islam failed, there have been plan to infiltrate our land and the said ‘grazing bill’ is the grand plan to infiltrate, kill us and usurp everything we are. This however goes with same history of how Sokoto was conquered and made a caliphate by hosting Hausa/Fulani that later took over. The said bill will forcefully take our lands and give them to Hausa/Fulani for settlement.
Finally, it is appropriate to state clearly that the bill being considered by the Nigerian National Assembly is not a grazing bill but a ‘settlement bill”. This bill will legally take our land and harbor armed Islamic Jihadists and terrorists in form of herdsmen. This bill will give them right to raise empires on our lands and tomorrow, they would wield their sword and Ak47, conquer us and stand their various caliphate and that would mark the end of our existence. We either die as Biafrans-Christians or live as Muslims. The effect of this bill will not only Islamize us but will force unnatural or armed inhabitants on us which will only but worsen the problem it deceitfully said to solve.
They mobilized a campaign for the Fulani herdsmen terrorists to start killing us on our land and then come back to say “let this killing stop by giving our lands to the terrorists to occupy”. We are Biafrans forced to be Nigerians under conquest and we are finally determined to go and re-establish our independence or we are die in another civil war. We have made it clear that it is ‘Biafra or death’.
By Ifeanyi Chijioke
For Family Writers
Charles Walker to have waded in and demanded clarifications is only but a humanitarian concern. Despite the fact I don’t know him, he is worthy of honor and I can rightly crown him ambassador of human right campaigners. There are others touched, who have reacted to the conscience of man that abhors evil and persecution. Biafra is a call for justice and sustenance of human existence in this part of the world where a race is a species of terror. We are a breed of terror and have left our land to foreign lands in search of peaceful existence and freedom, where at least we can have a merited sense of belonging. Charles, take a count and you will be shocked that Biafrans are the most traveled people on earth. We travel because our land is under slavery through perpetual political, infrastructural, economical and military conquest.
Charles Walker, my decision to giving a gospel reply to questions is to prove that we have moved on from 1967 and this is a computer age where nothing is hidden except nobody wants to know. The office of the Foreign and Commonwealth gave a reply which I will not oppose. They are entitled to how they want things to appear but they are not entitled to stopping the truth Charles deserves. I will digress; Foreign and Commonwealth office was quick to reiterate the unchanged position to protect the territorial integrity of Nigeria, though as a parent to the said territory, I expect nothing less than parental protection. Take a step backward and you will see the reaction of this office to Charles was what caused the most gruesome genocide on African soil without any punishment for the perpetrators. In 1967 to 1969, UK played a biased role and shielded Nigerian state while she kill and maim human life. You blocked all efforts for truth to be established and even the delegates sent to know what was going on in Biafra which you sponsored against peace-keeping soldiers. You restricted them from reporting what was going on, you were only interested in the economical gain of your monster and never gave any value to our existence. While some MPs fought to save Biafra from extermination, you worked hand in hand to cover everything just as you are covering it against Charles Walker. We did not finish, we defended our lives and today we are here but this second civil war, blood will flow to your domain.
APEX HYPOCRISY! British Foreign and Commonwealth Office denies knowledge of Nigeria brutality against Biafrans
You continued with lies while millions were perishing, you continued with effort to protect your monstrous creation at the detriment of Biafran lives and neither has you worked to tame your monster. You have kept the reality away from Charles because you think this is 1967 when no one had access to internet and computer. I am in Biafra land and hence I will give Charles the first hand information of what is going on as regards to his questions. You lied that there was no genocide going on in 1967 until pictures began to emerge, you are again lying that there is no potential civil war, Islamization through grazing bill, persecution and unwarranted clampdown on Biafrans. You are lying that there is no institutionalized degradation, when the leader of Indigenous People of Biafra (a product of 2007 UN declaration) has been in detention since October for being a British citizen and for verbally demanding freedom.
Charles, there is a potential risk of massive civil war in Nigeria as a result of the policy of Nigeria on Biafra. The policies as follows; (a) That for mentioning Biafra and peacefully adhering to 2007 charter on the rights of indigenous people, we have committed a crime called treasonable felony. (b) That our leader Nnamdi Kanu will not be released against court ruling and shall be incarcerated, convicted or killed. (c) That for lawfully and peacefully asking for Biafra, we shall be killed, incarcerated and forced to disappear. (d) That genocide shall be committed against us any day we come out to ask for Kanu’s release or Biafra, as it happened in Aba, Onitsha, Portharcourt, Delta etc. (e) that we shall not be included in the federation because we did not vote a sitting President. (f) That our land shall be a conquered land exploited at our detriment.
These policies prompted a movement most likely to result to civil war, the militant across Biafra land has mandated the release of Nnamdi Kanu and disintegration of Nigeria which as I speak, there is a war now on oil-field (war front) which is our battlefield and escalation is only a matter of time. While we are being killed and the Nigerian state cannot protect us because we are Biafrans, we may likely press self-defense button to save our lives.
Charles, there is no confiscation of any land in Biafra yet, but there is a law being sponsored by Buhari, which will give him right to confiscate Biafran lands and host his murderous Hausa/Fulani herdsmen jihadists and terrorists that have ravaged our land. Since 1989 Abuja declaration that Biafra land shall be Islamized to ensure full circle of Islam failed, there have been plan to infiltrate our land and the said ‘grazing bill’ is the grand plan to infiltrate, kill us and usurp everything we are. This however goes with same history of how Sokoto was conquered and made a caliphate by hosting Hausa/Fulani that later took over. The said bill will forcefully take our lands and give them to Hausa/Fulani for settlement.
Finally, it is appropriate to state clearly that the bill being considered by the Nigerian National Assembly is not a grazing bill but a ‘settlement bill”. This bill will legally take our land and harbor armed Islamic Jihadists and terrorists in form of herdsmen. This bill will give them right to raise empires on our lands and tomorrow, they would wield their sword and Ak47, conquer us and stand their various caliphate and that would mark the end of our existence. We either die as Biafrans-Christians or live as Muslims. The effect of this bill will not only Islamize us but will force unnatural or armed inhabitants on us which will only but worsen the problem it deceitfully said to solve.
They mobilized a campaign for the Fulani herdsmen terrorists to start killing us on our land and then come back to say “let this killing stop by giving our lands to the terrorists to occupy”. We are Biafrans forced to be Nigerians under conquest and we are finally determined to go and re-establish our independence or we are die in another civil war. We have made it clear that it is ‘Biafra or death’.
No comments
Post a Comment