SCORES OF BIAFRAN ACTIVISTS KILLED AND DUMPED IN A MORGUE BY NIGERIAN SOLDIERS DISCOVERED
Following the calculated attempted to deceive the general public and the international community on the heinous crime been committed daily by the men of the Nigerian security services and the intensification of falsehood, propaganda and evidence destruction by leaderships of the Nigerian Army and the Nigeria Police Force under statutorily retired but capitalistically retained Lt General Turkur Buratai and retiring IGP Solomon Arase respectively, over mass shooting, maiming and killing of dozens of unarmed, non violent and innocent IPOB/pro Biafran activists and their supporters across the Southeast of Nigeria as ordered by the duo recently .
The leadership of International Society for Civil Liberties & the Rule of Law (Intersociety) has resolved again to bring to the attention of all Nigerians and members of the international community including all international rights and media groups the irrefutable, un-concocted and shocking evidence of how jubilant and unarmed IPOB/pro Biafra activists, in their dozens, were shot at close range, maimed, abducted, murdered and dumped at the Anambra State Government owned Onitsha General Hospital by soldiers of the Onitsha Military Cantonment, headed by Col Issah Abdullahi.
The two senior security heads’ culpabilities stem from their widely published operational statements authorizing their sub commanders and subordinates to “use maximum force and other means available” to respond to non violent and peaceful processions, matches, prayers and street protests embarked upon by millions of IPOB/pro Biafra activists and their supporters across the Southeast and the South-south Nigeria. Each time their murderous orders are carried out by their subordinates, they storm public arenas and announce rewards for such “gallant” officers. Such rewards include promotions and other in-kind gifts or recognitions.
As a research and grassroots oriented rights organization in Nigeria, located at the heart of the Niger and Southeast of the country, we are appalled and saddened at all times reading and listening to lies or falsehoods of intensified magnitude dish out on daily basis by the military and the police authorities in the country as reasons for their actions or omissions to act in the dastardly act, the worst of it all is that the present Federal Government of Nigeria’s official policy is quadrupled into: repression, violence, falsehood and propaganda.
It already appears that the federally ruling party’s propaganda czar; Mr. Lai Mohammed, has exhausted stockpiles of lies or falsehood and propaganda in his party’s information warfare and warehouse and ordered for more containers-load from the Middle East and other troubled Africa countries and failed States.
Nigeria As A Rogue State Party Under International Law & UN System: Nigeria’s international obligations are speedily and steadily endangered or threatened. This is because its conducts under discussion are fundamentally affront to the Purposes and Principles of the United Nations; defined in Articles 1 and 2 of the UN Establishment Charter of 1945 as: “the maintenance of international peace and security; respect for the equal rights and self-determination of the peoples; international cooperation in economic, social, cultural and humanitarian matters, and the promotion of human rights for all without distinction”. Failure or omission to adhere to these purposes and principles of the UN by any member-State particularly the Federal Government of Nigeria is inexcusable and considered a serious threat to international peace and security.
According to Professor Thomas Hobbes, “the sovereignty of a State is no longer absolute. It is now challenged and kept live in the ability of the State to provide for the general wellbeing of her citizens (i.e. security and welfare)”. This is now commonly called “sovereignty as a responsibility or citizens’ sovereignty”. The State of Nigeria as presently constituted is steadily failing to live up to these expectations and sacred responsibilities. Turning State’s guns against its unarmed and nonviolent citizens are inexcusable crimes against humanity and a fundamental breach to the purposes and principles of the United Nations as well as the basic standards of the international law and humanitarian principles. Crimes Against Humanity are expressly and unambiguously defined by the UN and the International Criminal Law as “murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population, before or during the war, or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in the execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the UN or any of its recognized criminal courts, whether or not in violation of domestic laws of the country where perpetrated”.
Under the International Law & the Humanitarian Principles, Nigeria as a member of the UN is mandatorily obligated to adhere strictly to the ten basic or fundamental standards of its International Law and Humanitarian Principles, which are as follows: (1) everyone is or shall be entitled to equal protection of the law and protection from violence and threats and member-State shall ensure this; (2) member-State shall treat all victims of crime with compassion and respect and ensure protection of their safety and privacy; (3) member-State shall not use force on its citizens except when strictly necessary and proportionally and minimally necessitated; (4) member-State shall avoid use of force when policing unlawful but nonviolent assemblies; (5) member-State shall not use force except strictly for self defense and protection of others (i.e. handling riots and violent mob actions); (6) member-State shall arrest nobody unless there are legal grounds to do so and ensure it is done in line with lawful procedures; (7) member-State shall ensure that all detainees have access promptly after their arrest to their families, lawyers and medical assistance; (8) member-State shall ensure that all detainees are treated humanely; and further ensure that it does not instigate or inflict torture or tolerate any act of torture or ill treatment and its coercive agents holding detainees must refuse to obey any order to inflict torture on their detainees.
We invite all Nigerians and members of the international community to compare and contrast these international provisions willingly acceded to by Nigeria as a member of the United Nations and the dastardly act of opening fire, maiming and massacre of dozens of unarmed and nonviolent Biafran activists in the streets and perimeter fenced school grounds.
Our questions to Lt Generals Turkur Buratai and Gabriel Olanisakin; and retiring IGP Solom Arase and their culpable sub commanders and subordinates are: Does opening of fire and massacring of dozens of jubilant IPOB/pro Biafra activists singing and dancing at the Onitsha Niger Bridgehead over court ordered release of their leader amount to armed rebellion or mass violence and wanton destruction of public properties warranting deployment of crude State violence? How, too, does opening of fire and massacring of dozens of unarmed and nonviolent IPOB/pro Biafra activists assembled peacefully at a public secondary school field with perimeter fencing for the purpose of praying for the release of their leader (Nnamdi Kanu)amount to armed rebellion or mass violence or insurrection warranting the unleashing of crude State violence?
Breaches of the basic standards of the International Law and Humanitarian Principles and the Purposes and Principles of the United Nations by any member-State are considered by the UN and its Security Council as a serious threat to international peace and security and such breaches attract against such errant member-State coercive or non coercive humanitarian interventions and severe consequences. The United Nations had also in 1996 expanded “threats to international peace and security” to include “(1)extreme or complex humanitarian emergencies occasioned by gross human rights abuses by State or non State actors; (2) internal violence or armed conflict; and (3) disruption of democracy”.
The detailed analysis above is to educate the likes of Lt Gen Turkur Buratai and retiring IGP Solomon Arase that immunity within borders is not timeless and immunity across the borders has no place in the lexicon of international community. They can tell all the lies on earth while hanging on their uniforms but once their uniform immunities (if any) elapses, the international law as it is and as it ought to be shall command them to account for their actions and conducts while in office. The fate of Charles Taylor and Laurent Gbagbo send clear messages to other regime criminals that there is no hiding place for them.
Following the calculated attempted to deceive the general public and the international community on the heinous crime been committed daily by the men of the Nigerian security services and the intensification of falsehood, propaganda and evidence destruction by leaderships of the Nigerian Army and the Nigeria Police Force under statutorily retired but capitalistically retained Lt General Turkur Buratai and retiring IGP Solomon Arase respectively, over mass shooting, maiming and killing of dozens of unarmed, non violent and innocent IPOB/pro Biafran activists and their supporters across the Southeast of Nigeria as ordered by the duo recently .
 |
The leadership of International Society for Civil Liberties & the Rule of Law (Intersociety) has resolved again to bring to the attention of all Nigerians and members of the international community including all international rights and media groups the irrefutable, un-concocted and shocking evidence of how jubilant and unarmed IPOB/pro Biafra activists, in their dozens, were shot at close range, maimed, abducted, murdered and dumped at the Anambra State Government owned Onitsha General Hospital by soldiers of the Onitsha Military Cantonment, headed by Col Issah Abdullahi.
The two senior security heads’ culpabilities stem from their widely published operational statements authorizing their sub commanders and subordinates to “use maximum force and other means available” to respond to non violent and peaceful processions, matches, prayers and street protests embarked upon by millions of IPOB/pro Biafra activists and their supporters across the Southeast and the South-south Nigeria. Each time their murderous orders are carried out by their subordinates, they storm public arenas and announce rewards for such “gallant” officers. Such rewards include promotions and other in-kind gifts or recognitions.
As a research and grassroots oriented rights organization in Nigeria, located at the heart of the Niger and Southeast of the country, we are appalled and saddened at all times reading and listening to lies or falsehoods of intensified magnitude dish out on daily basis by the military and the police authorities in the country as reasons for their actions or omissions to act in the dastardly act, the worst of it all is that the present Federal Government of Nigeria’s official policy is quadrupled into: repression, violence, falsehood and propaganda.
It already appears that the federally ruling party’s propaganda czar; Mr. Lai Mohammed, has exhausted stockpiles of lies or falsehood and propaganda in his party’s information warfare and warehouse and ordered for more containers-load from the Middle East and other troubled Africa countries and failed States.
Nigeria As A Rogue State Party Under International Law & UN System: Nigeria’s international obligations are speedily and steadily endangered or threatened. This is because its conducts under discussion are fundamentally affront to the Purposes and Principles of the United Nations; defined in Articles 1 and 2 of the UN Establishment Charter of 1945 as: “the maintenance of international peace and security; respect for the equal rights and self-determination of the peoples; international cooperation in economic, social, cultural and humanitarian matters, and the promotion of human rights for all without distinction”. Failure or omission to adhere to these purposes and principles of the UN by any member-State particularly the Federal Government of Nigeria is inexcusable and considered a serious threat to international peace and security.
According to Professor Thomas Hobbes, “the sovereignty of a State is no longer absolute. It is now challenged and kept live in the ability of the State to provide for the general wellbeing of her citizens (i.e. security and welfare)”. This is now commonly called “sovereignty as a responsibility or citizens’ sovereignty”. The State of Nigeria as presently constituted is steadily failing to live up to these expectations and sacred responsibilities. Turning State’s guns against its unarmed and nonviolent citizens are inexcusable crimes against humanity and a fundamental breach to the purposes and principles of the United Nations as well as the basic standards of the international law and humanitarian principles. Crimes Against Humanity are expressly and unambiguously defined by the UN and the International Criminal Law as “murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population, before or during the war, or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in the execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the UN or any of its recognized criminal courts, whether or not in violation of domestic laws of the country where perpetrated”.
Under the International Law & the Humanitarian Principles, Nigeria as a member of the UN is mandatorily obligated to adhere strictly to the ten basic or fundamental standards of its International Law and Humanitarian Principles, which are as follows: (1) everyone is or shall be entitled to equal protection of the law and protection from violence and threats and member-State shall ensure this; (2) member-State shall treat all victims of crime with compassion and respect and ensure protection of their safety and privacy; (3) member-State shall not use force on its citizens except when strictly necessary and proportionally and minimally necessitated; (4) member-State shall avoid use of force when policing unlawful but nonviolent assemblies; (5) member-State shall not use force except strictly for self defense and protection of others (i.e. handling riots and violent mob actions); (6) member-State shall arrest nobody unless there are legal grounds to do so and ensure it is done in line with lawful procedures; (7) member-State shall ensure that all detainees have access promptly after their arrest to their families, lawyers and medical assistance; (8) member-State shall ensure that all detainees are treated humanely; and further ensure that it does not instigate or inflict torture or tolerate any act of torture or ill treatment and its coercive agents holding detainees must refuse to obey any order to inflict torture on their detainees.
We invite all Nigerians and members of the international community to compare and contrast these international provisions willingly acceded to by Nigeria as a member of the United Nations and the dastardly act of opening fire, maiming and massacre of dozens of unarmed and nonviolent Biafran activists in the streets and perimeter fenced school grounds.
Our questions to Lt Generals Turkur Buratai and Gabriel Olanisakin; and retiring IGP Solom Arase and their culpable sub commanders and subordinates are: Does opening of fire and massacring of dozens of jubilant IPOB/pro Biafra activists singing and dancing at the Onitsha Niger Bridgehead over court ordered release of their leader amount to armed rebellion or mass violence and wanton destruction of public properties warranting deployment of crude State violence? How, too, does opening of fire and massacring of dozens of unarmed and nonviolent IPOB/pro Biafra activists assembled peacefully at a public secondary school field with perimeter fencing for the purpose of praying for the release of their leader (Nnamdi Kanu)amount to armed rebellion or mass violence or insurrection warranting the unleashing of crude State violence?
Breaches of the basic standards of the International Law and Humanitarian Principles and the Purposes and Principles of the United Nations by any member-State are considered by the UN and its Security Council as a serious threat to international peace and security and such breaches attract against such errant member-State coercive or non coercive humanitarian interventions and severe consequences. The United Nations had also in 1996 expanded “threats to international peace and security” to include “(1)extreme or complex humanitarian emergencies occasioned by gross human rights abuses by State or non State actors; (2) internal violence or armed conflict; and (3) disruption of democracy”.
The detailed analysis above is to educate the likes of Lt Gen Turkur Buratai and retiring IGP Solomon Arase that immunity within borders is not timeless and immunity across the borders has no place in the lexicon of international community. They can tell all the lies on earth while hanging on their uniforms but once their uniform immunities (if any) elapses, the international law as it is and as it ought to be shall command them to account for their actions and conducts while in office. The fate of Charles Taylor and Laurent Gbagbo send clear messages to other regime criminals that there is no hiding place for them.
No comments
Post a Comment